Accessibility Features
Accessibility | Skip to Start of Article | Skip to Search | Skip to Navigation Menu | Skip to Themes | Skip to Regions | Skip to Members Sign InOn 17 November 2004 an invited audience, including Zoe Anderson, Public Affairs Officer (Civic Representation) at NICVA, took part in a mock trial of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1325. Zoe declares the outcome of the exercise.
On 17 November 2004 an invited audience took part in a mock trial of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1325.
Among other provisions, Resolution 1325:
‘Witnesses’ spoke on the role of women in public bodies, policing, politics and the peace process. They were then questioned by the ‘prosecution’ and ‘defence’; Kara Piccirilli and Sarah Shtier respectively from the Peace Women project in New York.
‘Judge’ Bronagh Hinds, who is a Senior Fellow at the Institute of Governance, Public Policy and Social Research at Queen’s University, asked the 'jury' audience to take into account all that they had heard and vote on the following:
‘Has the UK government of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Northern Ireland Executive and Northern Ireland Assembly when in being and Northern Ireland's political parties, demonstrated sufficient commitment to the implementation of Resolution 1325 in Northern Ireland, and in particular to those elements of the resolution that have been highlighted here today?’
The ‘no’ vote in response to this question was almost unanimous, with nobody voting ‘yes’ and two abstentions. It was therefore noted that the trial did not believe that the Resolution was being effectively implemented in Northern Ireland.
For further information on 1325, please visit www.peacewomen.org